Photo 1 Oct 133,201 notes

(Source: caloriqe)

via Ephedias.
Photo 1 Oct 17,104 notes illogicalpine:

me trying to cheer people up

illogicalpine:

me trying to cheer people up

(Source: buttpoems)

Photo 1 Oct 726 notes thethirdharris:

guns-n-stuff-i-guess:

revengeofthemudbutt:

cobra-23:

alexander-wolf:

A Dutch sniper lets a child pose on veterans day with the Barret M-82  this weapon is easily capable of taking somebody’s head clean off from a mile away, through a solid concrete wall.  This rifle is able to literally rip apart a human being. Its very saddening and sickening to see that they let children pose with this horrifying murderous weapon.
“State propaganda, when supported by the educated classes and when no deviation is permitted from it, can have a big effect. It was a lesson learned by Hitler and many others, and it has been pursued to this day.” 
Noam Chomsky 

You’re making false claims about the capability of this weapon. It does posess a extremely high ballistic coefficient but it cannot blow your head clean off through a wall at 1000 yards.

The barrett itself is more of a gimmicky weapon that a true tactical deployment. common myths include:"The shockwave of the bullet can tear your arm off even if the shooter misses.”False. The sheer disruption of air around a flying object smaller than your thumb is not going to detach a limb from your body."It can take someones head clean off at over a mile!”>how do I into terminal ballistics? Though the round (usually 670 gr. or so) carries quite a bit of kinetic energy, it’s penetration velocity and energy transference are not even close to being intense enough to remove the head from someones body. "Its so powerful, it can bring down a commercial jet in one shot!”We have weapons designed to fire larger rounds than this, at a rate of 4,500 rounds per minute (thats 75 rounds a second btw), to BRING DOWN AIRCRAFT. And they still have trouble sometimes. So let’s put this “mythbusters” worthy bullshit aside.
I could do this all day. The Barrett M82, though ridiculously enjoyable to shoot, is insanely expensive for civilian ownership and in the battlefield it’s not as tactically applicable as you might think. Hardly the “instrument of mass death and destruction” that you people like to make it out to be. Hey, gotta have ‘dem buzzwords though, right?My sources?I suppose you could say I am quite familiar with this weapon.

GET REKT

^^An actual professional giving facts

thethirdharris:

guns-n-stuff-i-guess:

revengeofthemudbutt:

cobra-23:

alexander-wolf:

A Dutch sniper lets a child pose on veterans day with the Barret M-82  this weapon is easily capable of taking somebody’s head clean off from a mile away, through a solid concrete wall.  This rifle is able to literally rip apart a human being. Its very saddening and sickening to see that they let children pose with this horrifying murderous weapon.

“State propaganda, when supported by the educated classes and when no deviation is permitted from it, can have a big effect. It was a lesson learned by Hitler and many others, and it has been pursued to this day.” 

Noam Chomsky 

You’re making false claims about the capability of this weapon. It does posess a extremely high ballistic coefficient but it cannot blow your head clean off through a wall at 1000 yards.

The barrett itself is more of a gimmicky weapon that a true tactical deployment. common myths include:
"The shockwave of the bullet can tear your arm off even if the shooter misses.”
False. The sheer disruption of air around a flying object smaller than your thumb is not going to detach a limb from your body.
"It can take someones head clean off at over a mile!”
>how do I into terminal ballistics? Though the round (usually 670 gr. or so) carries quite a bit of kinetic energy, it’s penetration velocity and energy transference are not even close to being intense enough to remove the head from someones body. 
"Its so powerful, it can bring down a commercial jet in one shot!”
We have weapons designed to fire larger rounds than this, at a rate of 4,500 rounds per minute (thats 75 rounds a second btw), to BRING DOWN AIRCRAFT. And they still have trouble sometimes. So let’s put this “mythbusters” worthy bullshit aside.



I could do this all day. The Barrett M82, though ridiculously enjoyable to shoot, is insanely expensive for civilian ownership and in the battlefield it’s not as tactically applicable as you might think. Hardly the “instrument of mass death and destruction” that you people like to make it out to be. Hey, gotta have ‘dem buzzwords though, right?
My sources?
image
image
image

I suppose you could say I am quite familiar with this weapon.

GET REKT

^^An actual professional giving facts

Video 1 Oct 186,308 notes

for-the-red-white-and-blue:

Amen. This is my view exactly

(Source: alanlozano)

Video 1 Oct 160,893 notes

silentauroriamthereal:

peacelovehappinessandwriting:

jamesfactscalvin:

mrshudsonstolemytardis:

Prince Harry and John Barrowman both do a mutual high five/ass slap combo omg

Can we just appreciate that John smacked Prince Harry’s royal ass so hard that the guy actually had to rub himself a little while John waves his hand

Can we just appreciate that John smacked Prince Harry’s royal ass 

It’s basically illegal not to reblog this.

Video 1 Oct 31,531 notes

(Source: shygirl364)

Photo 1 Oct 154,034 notes This guy has some real priorities

This guy has some real priorities

(Source: angelcasimiro)

Video 1 Oct 3,754 notes

Salute the fighting and the fallen more so

(Source: disgruntledlittlegrunt)

Photo 1 Oct 417 notes

(Source: glockfanatics)

Photo 1 Oct 42,751 notes stunningpicture:

If you’re picky about cosplaying your body type, then you’ll love this guy!

stunningpicture:

If you’re picky about cosplaying your body type, then you’ll love this guy!


Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.